bet9ja-promo-code-yohaig

bit.ly
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
bit.ly
By Natalie Sherman

Business reporter, New york city

A ban on sports betting wagering in many US states might be overturned by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.
bit.ly
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mainly banned sports betting gambling, describing the matter as a "states' rights" issue.

The case, which started on Monday, comes after New Jersey homeowners enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting.

A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.
bet9ja.com
Lower courts have actually consistently ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy choices.

The Supreme Court decided to hear the case nonetheless amid a wider shift in American attitudes towards gaming.

Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.

But in the last few years, states starving for tax revenue in the wake of the financial crash have enacted a rash of looser sports betting laws, gathering large levies on gambling profits.
bet9ja.com
There are now 24 states with commercial casinos - roughly double the number a years back.
bit.ly
Despite the main ban, which already excuses Nevada and 3 other states, illegal sports betting is swarming in the US.

Americans place about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.

The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.

It says the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is prevalent.

"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of important tax revenue and allow them to reap the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman stated.

More than 15 states filed papers in support of New Jersey in the event. A handful have currently passed laws to authorise sports betting in the event of a change.

'Times have changed'

On Monday, as attorneys began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.

The court is to make a choice in June 2018.

"If we succeed here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a decision by the court," stated outgoing New Jersey governor Chris Christie after going to the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're prepared to go."

Regardless of the court's final judgment, Congress may also use up the debate amidst more comprehensive discussion about online video gaming and e-sports betting.

Even some of the professional sports betting leagues have actually started to alter their positions on the question of gambling.

Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would create an uniform set of guidelines across the US. "Times have changed," he wrote in a 2014 opinion piece, external.

Addicts dealing with mobile wagering

3 October 2017
bit.ly
The tricky issue of issue sports betting

31 August 2017